USA - Presidential primaries :Trump’s paradox: more voters, less party support
Trump was running against himself in West
Virginia and Nebraska on Tuesday and won. He got a 75% in West Virginia and a
60,8% in Nebraska, where the local Governor Sasse is a vocal
critic.
The Nebraska Governor is not Trump’s sole critic.
The billionaire is now fighting a two front war, one to rally voters and one to
keep enough of the Republican Party behind him.
a small victory with two twists
The result did matter. Trump is now 100 delegates
away from securing the 1,237 delegates required to securing the nomination from
the first round of voting in Cleveland this July, outright. That too looks all
by certain to happen now.
In winning big, Trump is making a statement to
the Republican party elite that is still refusing to endorse him. But, his
major victory in Virginia is also telling of Trump’s core constituency, which
is white and blue collar. But, the twist in Trump’s victory can be summarized
as follows: the blue collar constituency is neither certain nor enough.
Twist no.1: parallel tracks with Sanders
Exit polls suggest that little less than half
(39%) of Bernie Sanders voters in West Virginia will eventually vote Trump in
November; 9% would vote for Clinton. In fact, there was a local gubernatorial
primary and Republican voters turning up might have been tempted to vote
against Hillary Clinton, or so Huffington Post suggests.
What is clear is that Sanders and Trump are
strong among blue-collar white working class in declining industries, such as
coal mining. West Virginia is the poorest state in the United States. Framed
otherwise, Sanders is effective against Trump because he is eating into his core
constituency in a way Clinton can’t. These are the voters worried about their
economic security.
The Sanders’ voters do not come from a pool of
usual Democratic voters in a state that votes Republican for 20 years. But,
while new voters should be welcome, no Democratic aspirant can hope to swing
West Virginia. This is safe Republican turf. Or is it?
Twist no.2: Winning the blue collar vote
is not enough for Sanders, or Trump
When Donald Trump won Indiana on May 3rd,
Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Reince Priebus
declared him “presumptive nominee” and called for party unity. Since, there has
been anything but unity among Republicans.
For one, House Speaker Paul Ryan
told CNN he was “not ready” to endorse Trump. And he took the discussion to
places Trump will never go, that is, policy. Ryan wants to demolish welfare and
shrink the state, which is bad news for Trump that is very much reliant on blue
collar voters.
In fact, there may be two Republican parties
running in November’s Presidential elections, of which Trump will be leading
one. The “Republican B” party will be that of the Republican elite that is
taking a stand against what Trump stands for. There is now talk of a “third
party” challenge, besides a war of attrition that should be taken for granted.
This would have to happen soon. The deadlines to
appear on ballots in Texas have already been missed, unless there is a
litigation challenge. And a similar deadline expires in Illinois, Indiana,
North Carolina, over the next few weeks. Time is against such a venture, but
the intention shows how serious the backlash within the Republican party really
is. Bottom line: independent candidates must at the very least produce 119,316
signatures endorsing their candidacy by July 15.
A third party campaign appears to have many, many
potential donors. But, once a party splits, its hard to stich it back. And two
Republican parties will make the other candidate look good, any day,
everywhere. At the same time, Trump is not reaching out to his opponents in the
Republican party he needs to mobilize to win over and beyond his core
constituency. He is a good showman, but has yet to become a politician.
SOURCES : CNN, Reuters, Huffington Post, MSNBC, NBC
Commentaires